A bite mark matching advocacy group just conducted a study that discredits bite mark evidence
The Washington Post: Paul Giannelli, the Albert J. Weatherhead III and Richard W. Weatherhead Professor in the School of Law and Distinguished University Professor, discussed using bite marks as legal evidence in a case. “There have been a number of cases over the years in which one bite mark analyst testified that a mark was a human mark, while another testified it was something entirely different,” he said.
