Court ruling on HIV meds could have sweeping implications for preventive care
Axios: Jonathan Adler, the Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law, offered his thoughts on a federal court ruling that struck down required coverage of HIV prevention medication, noting that the case may have sweeping implications for whether insurers will have to continue offering a range of no-cost preventive health services. “Self-insuring employers could pick and choose what they want to cover based on religious objections to certain types of coverage,” he said.